Jimmy Woo / Unsplash
CV NEWS FEED // The U.S. Supreme Court agreed March 10 to hear Chiles v. Salazar, a case that will determine whether Colorado can compel counselors to promote gender transitions while censoring other viewpoints.
Kaley Chiles, a licensed counselor, is challenging the law with the support of attorneys from Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF). According to ADF’s presentation of the case, many of Chiles’ clients seek her counseling because they share her Christian beliefs and want guidance that aligns with their faith.
However, Colorado law prohibits Chiles from offering that perspective. It forbids any conversation that encourages minors to accept their biological sex. Licensed counselors are prohibited from having any discussion with minors that “attempts or purports to change an individual’s sexual orientation or gender identity.” The law imposes serious penalties, including suspension or revocation of a counselor’s license, for those who do not comply.
At the same time, it allows — and even expects — counselors to affirm gender transitions.
ADF attorneys contend that Colorado’s law infringes on Chiles’ First Amendment rights by controlling the content of her discussions with clients, effectively imposing government censorship.
In a statement on their website, ADF CEO and General Counsel Kristen Waggoner pointed to the “growing consensus around the world” that adolescents with gender dysphoria need support and the ability to work through their struggles.
“Colorado’s law prohibits what’s best for these children and sends a clear message: the only option for children struggling with these issues is to give them dangerous and experimental drugs and surgery that will make them lifelong patients,” she said.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit upheld the law in September 2024, and ADF t in November 2024. With the high court now set to hear the case, the outcome could have significant implications for free speech and counseling practices nationwide.
